View
comments
Tudor Mendel-Idowu sobs as the pressure of performing on Child Genius starts to get to him
At the tender age of eight, Tudor Mendel-Idowu has been picked to play soccer for no fewer than three Premier League junior teams: QPR, Tottenham and Chelsea.
This achievement alone would be enough to make most fathers' hearts burst with pride. But, unfortunately for Tudor, he appears to have a very long way to go before he meets the sky-high expectations of his demanding dad, Tolu.
So far, the most heart-rending scenes on Channel 4's Sunday night reality series Child Genius — in which 20 gifted children are subjected to a terrifying barrage of tests — have been the sight of this small boy hiding his face in his hands as he weeps.
The reason? He has not scored as well as his father tells him he should have done.
Never mind that Tudor was asked to perform tasks beyond the reach of the vast majority of adults, such as recalling the order of two packs of randomly shuffled cards in less than an hour or answering such general knowledge questions as: 'What is the measure of the ability for a substance to become magnetised?'
Child Genius has been the perfect opportunity for Tolu, a pastor, to showcase his parenting philosophy which is 'the right combination of happiness — as well as fear — produces genius.'
However there is little happi ness seen in the training regime Tolu, 39, and wife Gold, 36, have organised for Tudor at their neat home near Wokingham, Berks.
Not even tea-time is a revision-free zone. As Tudor eats his meal, surrounded by dictionaries, encyclopedias and banks of Post-It notes, he is filmed being quizzed by his father on the spelling of 'cybernetics'
Any wrong answers are dismissed by his mother, Gold— a power-dressed NHS administrator who is just as fearsome as her husband — with words such as 'ridiculous.'
In recent episodes, Tudor was deliberately pitted against his big sister Hazelle, 11, who was also in the running until she was knocked out last week, leaving her too sobbing inconsolably.
Yet rather than commiserate with his son after a disappointing performance, it is Tolu, who declares that he fi nds the contest 'emotionally draining'. He then tells Tudor: 'Maybe you're not as good as we thought.'
Indeed in last night's episode, Tolu admitted what we already knew. 'It's now obvious this is more of a competition for parents than clever kids'.
Even for a nation well used to the mercenary exploitation of spy-on-the-wall television, this has raised concern.
As one worried viewer pointed out on Mumsnet, the series would more aptly be named 'Lunatic Parents'.
For it is really all about the Eagle Dads and Tiger Mums, who want to show off how much work they have invested in their youngsters.
Tudor's parents Gold, 36, and Tolu, 39, wince as their son fails to answer a question correctly
The show first aired in its current format last year, and — as the author of a book looking at the damage caused by competitive parenting — I had thought we would not see a return of this toxic mix of reality TV and hot-housing.
I had expected the sight of children as young as eight crying to prick the conscience of the commissioning editors.
A vain hope, of course.
Each episode consists of M astermind-style rounds that, for instance, challege the children to spell words such as psephology (the science of studying election statistics) or answer maths questions such as 'multiply 24 by 4, subtract 16 and multiply by 8, and finally divide by 2'.
At the end of each show, the five children with the lowest scores are sent home. For next week's final, they will be quizzed on their specialist subjects, ranging from the periodic table to the Battle of Stamford Bridge.
This year the young contestants have faced such gargantuan challenges as learning the entire London Underground map, while a voice-over cheerfully promises that such tasks will 'push these bright young minds — and their families — to their limits.'
However, so far the main role of children has been to demonstrate the fall-out from their parents' towering ambitions.
Never mind the trapped-in-the-headlights terror of small children blinking under the studio lights as they face interrogation on the podium.
The real 'entertainment' is designed to be found in the steely glares and winces of their parents sitting in the audience, who look as though they are receiving body blows whenever their child gets it wrong — and the extraordinary justifications they give for their pushiness.
After all, as one mother, who plasters spellings all over the bathroom walls to prepare her child for that particular round, declares: 'If the child is successful, it's the parents. If the child fails, it's not the child's fault — it's the lack of parenting.'
But extreme though this sounds, Child Genius has tapped into an increasingly dangerous trend in parenting; the mis guided belief that your offspring is a blank slate and if you hot-house them enough, you can be solely responsible for their success.
Pressure: Eleanor buries her face in her hands
Parenting is turning into a form of product development. Increasingly, we are falling for the notion that if we cram enough facts into their little brains we can make sure they come out on top.
The end result is a rise in depression and anxiety among a generation who believe they are losers if they fail, or could always do better if they win.
Like all offspring of pushy parents, who feel their family's affection is conditional on their success, children like Tudor are not just weeping because they didn't score well.
When he tries to cover his tears with his hands, saying 'What I achieved was absolutely terrible', after remembering the order of no fewer than 63 playing cards, he is facing a much darker fear: That he will lose his father's love if he does not come up to scratch.
The first time Tudor genuinely smiles in the programme is when he gets 5 out of 5 in a test in which he successfully spells dehydroepiandrosterone — a type of human hormone most of us didn't even know existed.
Although dad Tolu finally concedes he is 'impressed', he quickly adds: 'There's still a lot to be done.'
Another poignant sight has been little Curtis Elton's crestfallen face when he doesn't pass muster. Aged ten, Curtis, a tiny, wide-eyed boy, is used to being called the next Mozart.
His mother Hayley, 40, from Whetstone, North London, is the ultimate Tiger Mother. A professional pianist herself, it is down to her teaching that Curtis became the youngest child to ever pass Grade 8 piano two years ago.
Her tireless parenting means her son is also tipped to represent Britain at ice-skating in the 2022 Olympics.
But if that's not enough, at the start of the series Hayley said she wanted him to win Child Genius to prove he is clever as well as musical and athletic.
Didn't Hayley baulk at the uncomfortable scene in which she is shown dismissing her son's fears as he prepares to play Bach?
When the little boy, bugged-eyed with terror, whispers 'Mummy, I'm scared', she corrects him — in a way which is clearly meant to say the show will go on: 'No! You're fine.'
But for Hayley it's all part of the job. 'Curtis actually wasn't scared, he was just a little nervous because everyone was standing very close to him,' she reassures me afterwards.
Curtis Elton with his mother, Hayley, a professional pianist who has already taught her son to Grade 8 standard
As part of its justification for Child Genius, Channel 4 has claimed the series is a 'celebration of cleverness'.
Repeatedly, the voice-overs try to give the veneer of intellectual respectability with reminders that the series has been made in association with Mensa, the high IQ society — as if that makes it OK. But if Child Genius really aims to make it 'cool to be clever', why do the cameras home in so unsparingly on the social awkwardness of some of the competitors?
Advanced intellectual growth often comes at the cost of emotional and social development — as the programme-makers are all too keen to demonstrate.
One of the most difficult moments to watch comes when Rubaiyat, an 11-year-old doing degree-level maths, goes to his bookshelf, full of maths tomes, to find the volumes that will teach him what he really wants to know: How To Make Friends and How To Be Happy.
No wonder teachers have asked why, when some of the children clearly have behavioural, social or emotional difficulties, there has hardly been any mention of these conditions?
Last night, the programme crowed that the previous week the pressure had caused Eleanor, 12, to break down before she even made it to the podium. Yet here she was again.
Eleanor, an obsessive book-reader who devours 100 novels a month, may have picked up her first Dickens novel at the age of five. But she shows the kind of extreme black-or-white thinking that children with uneven emotional development often show.
Eleanor's mother claimed she didn't want her daughter to take part in the competition, but that Eleanor had applied herself. The youngster certainly displays an almost desperate determination to succeed, explaining: 'If you don't do well on Child Genius, you get kicked out of the round. If you don't do well at your A-levels, you don't get a place at a good university. If you don't get into a good university, you don't get a good job.
'If you don't get a good job, you don't get enough money and you starve to death.'
So was it any surprise that once again, after being flummoxed by the first few questions in the general knowledge round, her lip starts to wobble? When the stern-looking quiz master posed a difficult question on chemistry, Eleanor's face crumpled. Then her voice faded to a squeak before she dissolved into sobs and her mother had to take her away. As one reviewer put it, this is the kind of TV that 'makes you feel mucky for watching it'.
Finally, last night the elephant in the room was addressed with the introduction of 12-year-old Cuneyd, from North London, who has Asperger's syndrome. At one point, he is pictured hitting his head against a locker at school before addressing his fellow pupils about the condition.
< span>One of the effects is that Cuneyd struggles with words and their meanings. That means the spelling rounds will be tortuous. Not surprisingly he crashes out of the contest when asked to spell 'cochineal'. Quick — pan to one more shot of a child close to tears trying to deal with their defeat.
Of course, the goal of reality TV is to entertain — but should dramatic story-lines really come ahead of a child's emotional well-being?
In this country, we don't screen child beauty pageants because it would be seen as psychologically damaging. Why is it any more acceptable to show contests in which children's intelligence is judged?
Before broadcast, all the families were invited to view the episodes.
Perhaps it's a measure of their state of mind that some parents, such as psychologists Shosh ana and Sacha, who featured in the first two episodes, saw nothing harmful in describing their approach to bringing up their daughter Aliyah, nine, as though she is 'a well-bred race-horse'.
Shoshana openly pities parents left to bring up children without her skill set. She was blissfully oblivious to the fact that rest of us were watching, slack-jawed in disbelief at how hard she pushes her child.
Far from rushing to adopt such techniques, parents have reacted in horror. The internet has been buzzing with viewers saying they found the series 'upsetting to watch', 'heartbreaking' and expressing concern that it 'verges on abuse'.
Cuneyd with his father and mother. Affected by Asperger's, he had difficulty with words and their meanings
In a statement to the Mail, Channel 4 said the programme-makers followed 'the Ofcom Broadcasting Code and a robust set of bespoke processes and protocols which we put in place covering both the production and transmission'.
At any point, the families could stop the filming. They said psychologists, who interviewed them as part of the selection process, were on hand if anyone needed help or advice.
But, in reality, w hat is the likelihood that a child who feels their whole life is dependent on pleasing its parents will walk away — or that some of these narcissistic parents will admit defeat and throw in the towel?
Of course the producers may say the decision lies with the parents. But are such extreme parents really in a position to judge?
Such shows are meant to provoke a response from viewers. But it is the children who suffer, who have to face their peers afterwards. They return to their schools, never able to live down the label 'Child Genius', or ever being allowed to fail.
Indeed, as eight-year old Tudor hears he is through to the final next Sunday night, the weight of his family's expectations seem to be too much for his slight shoulders.
No doubt the reality is that Tolu is also a loving father, who sincerely believes he is doing the best for his son, and the producers have edited the programme to make him look like the ultimate caricature of an overbearing father.
But for me, one question remains — and it goes beyond the normal queries posed on the series, such as how to spell 'haemorrhoid'.
It's one that should be easier to answer: How much longer are we going to allow Channel 4 to encourage extreme parents to push their helpless children to breaking point in the name of entertainment?
Tanith Carey is author of Taming The Tiger Parent: How To Put Your Child's Wellbeing First In A Competitive World, to be published next month by Constable Little Brown at £8.99.
0 comments:
Post a Comment